web analytics

Opinion: The problem with Pure Blonde

July 31, 2015

Beer has an image problem. We know that.

Whenever the media has a story about alcohol issues or health concerns, a fat guy with beer is always trotted out to illustrate the story. When that happens, we all throw our hands up and ask, ‘why beer?’.

New Pure Blonde_smallEven large brewers acknowledge the issue. Last year Lion Beer, Spirits & Wine national sales director Mark Powell told a conference that beer had suffered from being poorly understood by the Australian public, citing research undertaken by the Brewers Association that indicated that beer was incorrectly perceived as “fattening”, “a lot less healthy than wine” and laden with chemicals.

“There’s a lot of these perceptions among beer drinkers that have pushed them away from the category and are probably stopping other people from entering the category as well,” he said.

While the industry campaign Powell outlined hasn’t eventuated, Lion is on the verge of announcing its own major campaign designed to challenge myths and negative perceptions of beer at an industry level. This is an important message that is long overdue, and Lion deserves considerable credit for undertaking the campaign alone.

What is our other major brewer doing to bring consumers back to the beer category? It is telling us that if you want to drink beer and still stay healthy, you need a special beer to do it.

Of course, if you ask CUB they don’t think that’s what they are saying. As Carlton & United Breweries marketing director Richard Oppy explained this week, the company believes it is “actually highlighting that beer is relatively not that bad for you. When you can use a beer like Pure Blonde to go up against wine, which is perceived by a lot of consumers as a healthier alternative, they’ll see that Pure Blonde actually has 50 per cent less calories than wine.”

That might be what CUB hears itself saying, but what the media actually reports – and the general public hears  – is that “Carlton United breweries is pushing the beer as the healthy alternative to all other brews.” [emphasis added].

It’s unfortunate that for all of their cleverness in crafting a message, marketers don’t get to also interpret the message that they send. The meaning rests with the customer because what is said matters less than what the consumer hears and consumers filter the message through their existing perceptions. As the media response to Pure Blonde Ultra shows, those hearing the message are hearing “yes, you’re right –  beer is fattening and unhealthy, so have this one instead.”

In saying that there’s only one beer to choose if you “still want to socialise and have a drink and have fun but don’t want the consequences of putting on weight”, CUB’s category approach is to further entrench the negative stereotypes and myths about beer.

Instead of communicating and reinforcing positive messages about beer generally, Pure Blonde’s overt message is to pander to the worst – and erroneous – perceptions of beer, perceptions even they themselves know hurt the category.

It is frustrating to highlight these issues with the company and be told, “people are more health conscious these days. Some days you are happy with one beer, others you want to have three or four. All we are doing is just giving people options.”

Unfortunately the message endorsed by dieticians and health experts is that if you want to be healthier then drink less, not drink fewer carbs. That’s a very inconvenient message when your business is based on selling beer by the carton and having it consumed by the six-pack.

And that’s the real story behind Pure Blonde.  As one national retail executive explained it to me, “the marketing truth behind low carb beers is that they are for people who want to feel good about not really changing their behaviour”. It’s a self-delusion that CUB is giving credence to, at the cost of the broader image of beer.

Beer has a problem, but Pure Blonde is not the solution. As they say, the first step to recovery is admitting that you are part of the problem.

Swindler Summer Ale

Tags: , , , , ,

3 Responses to Opinion: The problem with Pure Blonde

  1. Cody on August 30, 2015 at 2:21 pm

    Hi was just wondering why you had to take away the original pure blonde beer from your loyal customers I’ve been drinking the original pure blonde from day 1 I’m not happy as a customer why didn’t you just give it another name the new 1 and left the old 1 as it was I’ve tryed the new 1 and to me it tastes like soda water you should look at all the comments on your FB page and you will see what I’m talking about I’m sorry to say this but you are losing a lot of customers thanks ps your new pure blonde sux

    • Mark on September 13, 2015 at 2:47 am

      Couldn’t have said it better myself

  2. Matt on July 31, 2015 at 2:19 pm

    Well written article and one that certainly brings up some good points.

    Here’s my 2c:

    The big boys are scared… Look at the figures, standard lager type beers are declining in sales while many other categories are growing – Cider, Craft beer, Wine ect.

    Big breweries are churning out beer based on what a round table of in-house marketers think will make the most money and thus the board / shareholders happy. You can’t really blame them for it, that’s their job. It’s up to the consumer to educate themselves and the “little guys” to continue fighting the fight. They’re currently winning if growth is anything to go by.

    Why aren’t craft breweries and their association fighting fire with fire? Talk about reverse osmosis being unnatural, drinking real beers @ a lower strength is also reducing carbs and so is drinking in moderation!

    It’s a war out there and I know who’s side I’m on!

Leave a Reply